<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screen Resolution &#8211; Some Simple Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm</link>
	<description>The Mobile Web From A Desktop Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: best graphic design</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm/comment-page-1#comment-113229</link>
		<dc:creator>best graphic design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=20#comment-113229</guid>
		<description>I have explored many websites and I can say that most of the websites these days are based on 1024 x 768 resolution. By the way this article is quite unique in dealing with one of the important factors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have explored many websites and I can say that most of the websites these days are based on 1024 x 768 resolution. By the way this article is quite unique in dealing with one of the important factors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Positive Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm/comment-page-1#comment-113129</link>
		<dc:creator>Positive Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=20#comment-113129</guid>
		<description>I think 1024x768 is the most common resolution and many websites are optimized for this resolution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 1024&#215;768 is the most common resolution and many websites are optimized for this resolution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tai chinh ngan hang</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm/comment-page-1#comment-112716</link>
		<dc:creator>tai chinh ngan hang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=20#comment-112716</guid>
		<description>We now design all our websites in 1024x768. 
Why ? After looking at Google Analytics of one huge site in our system ( over 1.4 mil impression/day). What we got are: 8.2% users see our page in 800x600 screen. Others are using 1024 and above.

Thus, why should we mess with more than 90% of our visitors to keep the minority happy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now design all our websites in 1024&#215;768.<br />
Why ? After looking at Google Analytics of one huge site in our system ( over 1.4 mil impression/day). What we got are: 8.2% users see our page in 800&#215;600 screen. Others are using 1024 and above.</p>
<p>Thus, why should we mess with more than 90% of our visitors to keep the minority happy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Manchester</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm/comment-page-1#comment-112711</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Manchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=20#comment-112711</guid>
		<description>Compatibility has been an issue with websites for years, not just on a screen level, but coding and browsers also. As the saying goes &quot;you can&#039;t please them all&quot;; this is an undeniably accurate statement when it comes to the websites available today. In order to successfully make your website compatible on one level, you have to sacrifice another level. If you adjust for screen resolution you compromise design, if you adjust for browsers you compromise code, if you adjust for usability you compromise SEO, etc. These of course do not necessarily apply in this order, but the nature of these issues is a real problem.

The “majority rule” is the only logical solution, design and build for the most common user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compatibility has been an issue with websites for years, not just on a screen level, but coding and browsers also. As the saying goes &#8220;you can&#8217;t please them all&#8221;; this is an undeniably accurate statement when it comes to the websites available today. In order to successfully make your website compatible on one level, you have to sacrifice another level. If you adjust for screen resolution you compromise design, if you adjust for browsers you compromise code, if you adjust for usability you compromise SEO, etc. These of course do not necessarily apply in this order, but the nature of these issues is a real problem.</p>
<p>The “majority rule” is the only logical solution, design and build for the most common user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cole</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm/comment-page-1#comment-98000</link>
		<dc:creator>cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=20#comment-98000</guid>
		<description>This is one of those good articles to read before you begin a website.  I&#039;ve had some issues in my early days related to screen size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those good articles to read before you begin a website.  I&#39;ve had some issues in my early days related to screen size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 800 x 600 folk are where it&#8217;s at &#124; StayGoLinks</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/screen-resolution-some-simple-advice.htm/comment-page-1#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>The 800 x 600 folk are where it&#8217;s at &#124; StayGoLinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=20#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>[...] This is somewhat amusing. We have had all that interminable discussion about whether you should now design for the typical 1024 x 768 pixel resolution viewer or something even bigger. Yet the latest is that Microsoft is now bringing out the Ultra-mobile PC (UMPC) Display Emulator. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is somewhat amusing. We have had all that interminable discussion about whether you should now design for the typical 1024 x 768 pixel resolution viewer or something even bigger. Yet the latest is that Microsoft is now bringing out the Ultra-mobile PC (UMPC) Display Emulator. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
