<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Look Mom No Home Page LMNHP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm</link>
	<description>The Mobile Web From A Desktop Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115757</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 02:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115757</guid>
		<description>I do not believe that this process creates a long term problem of the type you describe, but rather is very much in the spirit of what you quote from the patent.  Only Google could comment with knowledge, but I believe this creates less problems than the continually changing content of the default blog home page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe that this process creates a long term problem of the type you describe, but rather is very much in the spirit of what you quote from the patent.  Only Google could comment with knowledge, but I believe this creates less problems than the continually changing content of the default blog home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkljkl</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115755</link>
		<dc:creator>jkljkl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115755</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you directly apply noindex to home page?
IMO, I think this fools Google in the long run, especially if you update your blog frequently.
Here is a quote from US Patent No. 7627613

Besides submitting the permanent redirect information to Dupserver 224, content filters 210 also call upon the Dupserver 224 to replace the URL fingerprints of permanently redirected outgoing links in downloaded pages with the URL fingerprints of the target URLs of those permanent redirects.

 I mean, once google crawl your home page and just to find out it has been permanently redirected to an inner page,  google will do something to 301, for example, redirect link juice from home page to the inner page. If you update your blog frequently, em, this might be suspicious behavior in the eye of G. Of course, this is just theory.

Maybe I don&#039;t exactly understand LMNHP or because I&#039;m a seo newbie, anyway, please correct me if I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you directly apply noindex to home page?<br />
IMO, I think this fools Google in the long run, especially if you update your blog frequently.<br />
Here is a quote from US Patent No. 7627613</p>
<p>Besides submitting the permanent redirect information to Dupserver 224, content filters 210 also call upon the Dupserver 224 to replace the URL fingerprints of permanently redirected outgoing links in downloaded pages with the URL fingerprints of the target URLs of those permanent redirects.</p>
<p> I mean, once google crawl your home page and just to find out it has been permanently redirected to an inner page,  google will do something to 301, for example, redirect link juice from home page to the inner page. If you update your blog frequently, em, this might be suspicious behavior in the eye of G. Of course, this is just theory.</p>
<p>Maybe I don&#8217;t exactly understand LMNHP or because I&#8217;m a seo newbie, anyway, please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Pages Suck On Google &#124; Search Engine People &#124; Toronto</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115748</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Pages Suck On Google &#124; Search Engine People &#124; Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 13:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115748</guid>
		<description>[...] One sure way that bloggers can have their blog posts correctly identified in the SERPs is to follow the LMNHP approach. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One sure way that bloggers can have their blog posts correctly identified in the SERPs is to follow the LMNHP approach. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Godin Thinks Bigger Is Better &#124; BPWrap</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115746</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Godin Thinks Bigger Is Better &#124; BPWrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 05:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115746</guid>
		<description>[...] If you have the boldness to go where few others have gone as yet, you may abandon your Home Page and present only the most recent post.&#160; It&#8217;s what we call the LMNHP approach. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you have the boldness to go where few others have gone as yet, you may abandon your Home Page and present only the most recent post.&nbsp; It&#8217;s what we call the LMNHP approach. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Marshmallow Challenge &#124; BPWrap</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115525</link>
		<dc:creator>The Marshmallow Challenge &#124; BPWrap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115525</guid>
		<description>[...] in another way.&#160; Like the other SMM blogs, this blog is currently structured according to the LMNHP (Look Mom No Home Page) approach.&#160; It is early days and the key measure of how useful this approach is will come from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in another way.&nbsp; Like the other SMM blogs, this blog is currently structured according to the LMNHP (Look Mom No Home Page) approach.&nbsp; It is early days and the key measure of how useful this approach is will come from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Home Pages Suck &#124; Search Engine People &#124; Toronto</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115467</link>
		<dc:creator>Home Pages Suck &#124; Search Engine People &#124; Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115467</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#039;re stumped then you will find the answer in a post about the LMNHP approach.&#160; It is still early days but it does appear that this approach does give higher [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#39;re stumped then you will find the answer in a post about the LMNHP approach.&#160; It is still early days but it does appear that this approach does give higher [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fashion watch</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115459</link>
		<dc:creator>Fashion watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115459</guid>
		<description>This is a fascinating article and the first time I have come across this idea. I always thought a home page was a total necessity – anyway I too will be very curious to see how this works out over time, and also to know how the balance of your link portfolio ends up – whether it will indeed end up with more PR distributed to individual pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating article and the first time I have come across this idea. I always thought a home page was a total necessity – anyway I too will be very curious to see how this works out over time, and also to know how the balance of your link portfolio ends up – whether it will indeed end up with more PR distributed to individual pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115458</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115458</guid>
		<description>Excellent question, Mert.  Bing is difficult to deciper and as yet there is no clear picture there.  So far this has been spidered by Yahoo and from the caches it would appear that Yahoo is behaving similarly to Google in recognizing the 301 redirection.

Again as with Google, it is the longer term behavior that is of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent question, Mert.  Bing is difficult to deciper and as yet there is no clear picture there.  So far this has been spidered by Yahoo and from the caches it would appear that Yahoo is behaving similarly to Google in recognizing the 301 redirection.</p>
<p>Again as with Google, it is the longer term behavior that is of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mert</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115457</link>
		<dc:creator>Mert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115457</guid>
		<description>What about yahoo and bing who doesnot show the same respect to 301s as Google does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about yahoo and bing who doesnot show the same respect to 301s as Google does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackgown.us</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/look-mom-no-home-page.htm/comment-page-1#comment-115439</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackgown.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 03:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=767#comment-115439</guid>
		<description>Logically it does make sense.. im interesting in it actually im gonna trying this.. hehe thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logically it does make sense.. im interesting in it actually im gonna trying this.. hehe thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

