<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guy Kawasaki Repeats Tweets: So Do It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm</link>
	<description>The Mobile Web From A Desktop Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:11:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: prevod</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114448</link>
		<dc:creator>prevod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114448</guid>
		<description>I think that repeating tweets is important exactly because of the their big number. That&#039;s how the more important ones can get through the mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that repeating tweets is important exactly because of the their big number. That&#8217;s how the more important ones can get through the mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mondo</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114423</link>
		<dc:creator>mondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114423</guid>
		<description>Repeating tweets sound stupid and I wouldn&#039;t do it. On the other hand I only have few followers and I only follow few people so it would be stupid to get those same few tweets over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repeating tweets sound stupid and I wouldn&#8217;t do it. On the other hand I only have few followers and I only follow few people so it would be stupid to get those same few tweets over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO training</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114405</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114405</guid>
		<description>I have a confession... I do the same. Repeating tweets is pretty common for those of us using Twitter. It only makes sense to retweet because you are sharing what you think is valuable and worthy of sharing.  I think its okay because you&#039;re giving credit where credit is due and not stealing someone elsees content. The RT is a great way to share and provide value for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a confession&#8230; I do the same. Repeating tweets is pretty common for those of us using Twitter. It only makes sense to retweet because you are sharing what you think is valuable and worthy of sharing.  I think its okay because you&#8217;re giving credit where credit is due and not stealing someone elsees content. The RT is a great way to share and provide value for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Marketer</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114395</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Marketer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114395</guid>
		<description>As you said, as Twitter gets bigger and bigger, it will continue to evolve.  Into what is anyone&#039;s guess.  I personally don&#039;t use it much, or see the purpose of it.  But that&#039;s me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you said, as Twitter gets bigger and bigger, it will continue to evolve.  Into what is anyone&#8217;s guess.  I personally don&#8217;t use it much, or see the purpose of it.  But that&#8217;s me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Welford</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114386</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Welford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114386</guid>
		<description>I would agree with you if you have a short list of followers, who all tended to follow few people.  In reality you&#039;re dealing with a low-probability event when one of your followers spots one of your tweets.  Most of your tweets will not be seen by any of your followers.  Some followers may see one of the tweets.  The odds that they see more than one are pretty minimal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with you if you have a short list of followers, who all tended to follow few people.  In reality you&#8217;re dealing with a low-probability event when one of your followers spots one of your tweets.  Most of your tweets will not be seen by any of your followers.  Some followers may see one of the tweets.  The odds that they see more than one are pretty minimal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catalog Printers</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114385</link>
		<dc:creator>Catalog Printers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114385</guid>
		<description>I think that this is actually a tough moral issue. On the one hand there are clear and obvious positive results from repeating tweets, from a business standpoint, and on the other hand you are being pretty spammy from the perspective of your followers. It&#039;s like if you called your friends 4 times a day to tell them the same thing. They&#039;d get very annoyed and would certainly ask you to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is actually a tough moral issue. On the one hand there are clear and obvious positive results from repeating tweets, from a business standpoint, and on the other hand you are being pretty spammy from the perspective of your followers. It&#8217;s like if you called your friends 4 times a day to tell them the same thing. They&#8217;d get very annoyed and would certainly ask you to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miami Wedding Photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114382</link>
		<dc:creator>Miami Wedding Photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114382</guid>
		<description>We can repeat tweets i think, twitter doesn&#039;t care about twitter flooding issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can repeat tweets i think, twitter doesn&#8217;t care about twitter flooding issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sourav</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114381</link>
		<dc:creator>Sourav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114381</guid>
		<description>So sad that everything in this internet is becoming so spammy and non qualitative....Is there a solution for this ....I have doubts...Google indexes billions of pages but if you go to 2nd page of google for any search performed all will be crap...Twitter is becoming like that ....so sad

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sad that everything in this internet is becoming so spammy and non qualitative&#8230;.Is there a solution for this &#8230;.I have doubts&#8230;Google indexes billions of pages but if you go to 2nd page of google for any search performed all will be crap&#8230;Twitter is becoming like that &#8230;.so sad</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jess SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114377</link>
		<dc:creator>jess SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114377</guid>
		<description>well twitter has change a lot ... its grown alot, and its very usefull.. i just started using twitter and its amazing .. and i dont have a problem with the retweets.. well i had no problem with it so far..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well twitter has change a lot &#8230; its grown alot, and its very usefull.. i just started using twitter and its amazing .. and i dont have a problem with the retweets.. well i had no problem with it so far..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebStrat</title>
		<link>http://www.staygolinks.com/guy-kawasaki-repeats-tweets-so-do-it.htm/comment-page-1#comment-114364</link>
		<dc:creator>WebStrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.staygolinks.com/?p=687#comment-114364</guid>
		<description>Would be great if Twitter could add a checkbox for when following someone, that indicates a higher level of followers....example...if I could checkbox those that I actually know and want to read over those that I&#039;m interested in but don&#039;t know personally or don&#039;t want to watch everything they chat about....those that I&#039;ve checkboxed would have a &#039;weighting&#039; of stickiness to my page so I&#039;d have a better chance of seeing what they&#039;re posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be great if Twitter could add a checkbox for when following someone, that indicates a higher level of followers&#8230;.example&#8230;if I could checkbox those that I actually know and want to read over those that I&#8217;m interested in but don&#8217;t know personally or don&#8217;t want to watch everything they chat about&#8230;.those that I&#8217;ve checkboxed would have a &#8216;weighting&#8217; of stickiness to my page so I&#8217;d have a better chance of seeing what they&#8217;re posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
