Now it would appear that the Web is in a much more hazardous position.  This is the Web we all know (as in World Wide Web) although Robert Scoble prefers to call it the  ‘common web’ while Chris Saad and Adam Singer call it the ‘Open web’.

The death of the Web has been a recurring theme in recent times but this latest wave is triggered by a post from Robert Scoble berating Dave Winer and John Battelle for not saving the common web before it was too late.  They were not there supporting him on January 3, 2008 when he tried to link his Facebook contacts to the common web.  

The lesson today, four years later, is that the common web is in grave threat, not just from Facebook’s data roach motel but from Apple’s and Amazon’s and, now, Google.
…
Normal users don’t care about the argument anymore and they are addicted to Facebook and Google+ and Twitter and apps on iPhones and Android. Heck, if you are at the Super Bowl tomorrow the official app is on iOS and Android and not other platforms.

Chris Saad is a little more sanguine in suggesting The Open Web Is Dead – Long live the Open Web

Robert Scoble is right about the Open Web. It’s in real danger. URLs are fading into the background,  native Mobile apps are all the rage and Facebook threatens to engulf the web into a proprietary black hole.

However he also is optimistic that this is a cycle:

The battle of Open vs. Closed is a sine wave. First, closed, proprietary solutions come to define a new way of fulfilling a use case and doing business. They solve a problem simply and elegantly and blaze a path to market awareness, acceptance and commercialization. Open, however, always follows. Whether it’s a year, a decade or a century, Open. Always. Wins. The only question is how long, as an industry, are we going to keep our tail tucked between our legs in front of the the great giant proprietary platform of the moment or are we going to get our act together to ensure the “Time to Open” is as short as possible. It takes courage, co-ordination and vision, but we can all play our part to shorten the time frame between the invention of a proprietary app and the absorption of that value into the open web platform.

Adam Singer is also optimistic in suggesting The Open Web (Still) Isn’t Going Away.

It makes the most sense to develop a digital strategy that invests in both the open web and in other people’s platforms in such a way that is designed to meet outcomes (vs. just being trendy).

He bases this view on the following tenets:

• Media companies (modern and traditional) are not just going to abandon their sovereignty
• Serious artists / content creators use both corporately-owned platforms and independent
• Archives still have a lot of value for real people (even if early adopters continue to ignore this)
• RSS / email are far from dead, they’re actually really useful. Just not “sexy” – but who cares when you can easily use them too?
• As a digital marketer and content creator, my professional workstation always beats mobile for real work

From all this it would appear that the Web will cover perhaps the minor share of all the information on the Internet.  In such a case if Google indexes only URLs that appear on the Web, any search they do would provide a very partial answer to queries.  PageRank would no longer have relevance.  Could they still deliver a satisfactory user experience?  It all looks very bleak for Google Web Search.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Google Web Search On Its Last Legs

Technorati Tags: app internet, Facebook, Saad, Scoble, web

Related Posts

• January 29, 2012 -- The App Internet – Disruptive Technology For Google Search (1)
• August 12, 2009 -- Mobile Local Marketing – or MLM (4)
• May 29, 2009 -- Social Media Is An Oxymoron (19)
• March 31, 2009 -- Twitter Chat Rooms (4)
• February 18, 2009 -- The NOW Web Is Not The Mobile Web (2)

In case the title is a little baffling, we’ll go step by step through what it means.  Apologies to those who wish to proceed more rapidly.  A disruptive technology is defined as follows:

Disruptive technology is a term coined by Harvard Business School professor Clayton M. Christensen to describe a new technology that unexpectedly displaces an established technology.
…

Christensen demonstrates how it is not unusual for a big corporation to dismiss the value of a disruptive technology because it does not reinforce current company goals, only to be blindsided as the technology matures, gains a larger audience and market share and threatens the status quo.

As you will see, that is a most appropriate explanation for what we are about to discuss.

App

Most people will know the word App which can be defined as follows:

(APPlication) The term has been used as shorthand for "application" in the IT community for decades. An app is a piece of software. It can run on the Internet, on your computer, or on your phone or other electronic device.  However, it became newly popular for mobile applications in smartphones and tablets, especially due to the advent of Apple’s iTunes App Store in 2008.

The Mobile Web

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has promoted a Mobile Web Initiative:

Combining the power of the Web with the strengths of mobiles devices.

W3C’s mission includes ensuring that the Web be available on as many kind of devices as possible. With the surge of powerful mobile devices in the past few years, the role of the Web as a platform for content, applications and services on these devices is increasingly important.

Google Search Promotes The Mobile Web

Google has a dominant position in search on the Web.  The Mobile Web is increasingly important so naturally Google wishes to maintain its search superiority in this new ‘cyber-space’ too.  That is why we see initiatives such as its advice on Making Websites Mobile Friendly.

The Mobile Web Is Challenging And Can Be Annoying To Users

Unfortunately it is not always easy to condense the information visible on a desktop PC screen to a screen, which may have only 10% of the screen ‘real estate’.  Input of data and control is also much more difficult since keyboards are tiny and there are no mice.

This is why many suggest a satisfactory user experience on a smart phone will only be achievable using an App rather than a traditional web page.  Some far sighted people were seeing this 15 years ago.

In 1997, Wired published a now-infamous “Push!” cover story, which suggested that it was time to “kiss your browser goodbye.” The argument then was that “push” technologies such as PointCast and Microsoft’s Active Desktop would create a “radical future of media beyond the Web.”

This is now borne out by what is happening in the market-place.  According to Mashable, Consumers Are Now Spending More Time on Mobile Apps Than the Web. 

It is hardly surprising to see headlines such as The Web Is Dead. Long Live the Internet.

We should be clear on the dynamics.  It’s not just that Apps work better.  What we see on the Mobile Web is often hardly a satisfactory user experience.  As ReadWriteWeb suggests, Like a Gangly 8-Year-Old, the Mobile Web Needs to Grow Up.  As they say the Mobile Web is often annoying.

The App Internet

Forrester CEO George Colony gave a speech at LeWeb, where he proclaimed three thunderstorms are coming. The first one of these is the death of the web and the emergence of a new kind of Internet called the “App Internet.”

As John McCarthy of Forrester Research explains:

I see innovation coming from the combination of apps and smart devices like appliances and cars, improved user experience around the apps by better leveraging the context from the sensors in the devices, and enabling the apps to take advantage of new capabilities like near field communications (NFC) for things such as mobile payments.

Using An App Does Not Require Google Search

If we are living on the Internet, but not on the Web, then that implies a different role for search engines such as Google Search.  Likely it is a much smaller role and whether it can support the same volume of advertising are key questions that come to mind.  Google will continue to have a major stake in the App Internet through Android and through its Chrome Webstore.  However Google will have to reconsider its strategy in the light of this major shift.

Post from: StayGoLinks

The App Internet – Disruptive Technology For Google Search

Technorati Tags: Android, app internet, forrester research, george colony, mashable

Related Posts

• February 6, 2012 -- Google Web Search On Its Last Legs (2)
• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)
• December 3, 2011 -- Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Looks A Winner (1)
• November 29, 2011 -- Google’s Android May Pay Billions To Apple (3)

The biggest conflict we have seen all year has been in the smartphone industry. iPhone and Android have been battling each other all year long, which has actually put several phone makers in court. So which really is the best? Should you go with Android or iPhone? 

Android Becomes Best Selling OS: Android – 1, iPhone – 0

There is no denying that Android is the most common operating system available on smartphones. 2011 was the year that Android came to prominence and really started showing their dominance in the overall marketplace. While the Apple iOS is only available on the iPhone and Android is available on a wide spectrum of devices, it is still clear that more people are accessing apps like Facebook and Twitter from Google’s OS.

The Tablet War: Android – 1, Apple – 1

Despite the different Android tablets available on the market, the iPad is still the clear and dominant force in the tablet world. While the Kindle Fire launched in the latter part of the year, the iPad still soared above competition as the leading seller for the all-important Christmas retail season.

The Samsung Galaxy S II: Android – 2, iPhone – 1

Tech writers and critics are clamoring about the release of the Samsung Galaxy S II. Not only is the screen bigger than the iPhone 4S, the processor, graphics, and overall functionality of the product are leaps and bounds above the new iPhone product. This may mark the first step Android phone manufacturers have taken to undermine the iPhone’s dominance as the device for creatives.

Apple Beats HTC in Lawsuit: Android -2, iPhone – 2

The legal patent battle between these two companies produced a slight win for the iPhone this year. According to CNET, Apple has forced HTC to stop producing phones that include technology Apple trademarked earlier. HTC has until late April to fix their phones or come up with a contentious counter-argument to take Apple back to court.

Siri: Android -2, iPhone -2

The introduction of the iPhone 4S brought about the release of the Siri app. iPhone claimed that this piece of software would be the first artificial intelligence device that fully integrated with the human experience. But so far, no one seems to be using the technology. Once more data is collected from users, Siri may pan out to be a unique iPhone product, but only time will tell. For the moment, this leaves the score level.

What will the year 2012 bring for these two mobile tech giants? There are rumors that the iPhone 5 and iPad 3 will be released and Google is working on making the Android voice activated technology even greater. Expect to see Nokia bring their flexible phone technology on the Windows operating platform at some point. On this battle-field, don’t expect to see anything coming from the Blackberry manufacturer RIM unless it is news about their bankruptcy.

Author Bio:  Sam Peters is a blogger who frequently writes for entrepreneurial and tech blogs covering topics from online marketing to the newest gadget and mobile web news.

Post from: StayGoLinks

iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011?

Technorati Tags: Android, Apple, HTC, ipad, iPhone, patent

Related Posts

• December 3, 2011 -- Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Looks A Winner (1)
• November 16, 2008 -- Botch Your Buzz (ByB) (2)
• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)
• November 29, 2011 -- Google’s Android May Pay Billions To Apple (3)
• November 10, 2011 -- Awesome Siri, Aweless Iris (3)

Siri, the virtual assistant for the Apple iPhone 4S, when it appeared two months ago seemed possibly to be an Android killer.  It had both natural language technology together with artificial intelligence.  Given Apple’s emphasis on usability and user convenience, it promised to be impressive and so it was to many.  Google perhaps as one might expect was less enthusiastic.

Andy Rubin, Google – Strategy or Subterfuge

Andy Rubin, Senior VP Mobile, Google said that the Siri was wrong-headed since a phone should merely act as an intermediary between humans and should not be a virtual assistant.  Whether this was a confirmation of Google’s Mobile strategy or merely a smoke-screen to cover up their real intentions, only time will tell.

Now word is that Google is launching a Siri rival for the Android.  It apparently is code-named Majel.

Codenamed “Majel” after the late actress Majel Barrett-Roddenberry, who provided the computerized voice of the Starship Enterprise in “Star Trek,” the technology will reportedly upgrade Android’s “Voice Actions” app, which lets users make calls, get directions and perform searches on Android smartphones using voice commands.

Google chairman Eric Schmidt had voiced concerns over Siri’s potential to transform search and thus compete with Google’s core business. Majel’s debut may put these concerns to rest by endowing Android handsets with voice-activated search capabilities comparable to those of the Apple iPhone.

What Majel does not offer

Majel may offer enhanced voice-actuated search capabilities but it seems clear that it cannot quickly catch up to the artificial intelligence that Siri offers. This is based  on a military DARPA project, and is the culmination of over 40 years of research.

Even though Robin Williams may be somewhat disparaging on what Siri can do for you (as you can check in the video below), it seems likely that Siri will have great user appeal. Android may need to do some fast peddling to catch up.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival

Technorati Tags: Android, Apple, artificial intelligence, darpa, siri

Related Posts

• November 8, 2011 -- Siri Is An Android Killer (8)
• November 10, 2011 -- Awesome Siri, Aweless Iris (3)
• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 3, 2011 -- Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Looks A Winner (1)
• November 29, 2011 -- Google’s Android May Pay Billions To Apple (3)

The outstanding Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Honeycomb tablet is lighter and a hair thinner than the Apple iPad 2, and has a smaller footprint than either the Motorola Xoom or the Acer Iconia Tab A500, which are heavier and bulkier than most tablets.  The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is a major contender.

If you check out the specs, you will be even more impressed.

That 10″ wide screen just invites you to get involved.  The iPad has already prepared the market place for devices like this and the Galaxy Tab may well be the major beneficiary.

The only impediment on the road may be the patent conflicts that are already ongoing between Apple and Android / Samsung.  The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has again been delayed in Australia by the courts.  However this is only temporary.  Note also that the full Federal Court of Australia seemed to have found Apple’s objections to the tablet sales somewhat lacking.

The full court found that Justice Annabelle Bennett did not adequately assess the strength of Apple’s patent claims when she allowed a ban to go into effect last month.
“In our view, her decision was clearly wrong and should be set aside,” the full court wrote.

Now in the US, the headlines are that Judge rejects Apple bid to halt Galaxy sales.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh  in San Jose, California stated that Apple would likely prove Samsung infringed one of its tablet patents. However, Apple had not shown that it was likely to overcome Samsung’s challenges to the patent’s validity.  Apple must demonstrate both infringement and validity to succeed in its lawsuit.

Global tablet sales are expected to explode to more than 50 million in 2011. Apple, which has sold more than 30 million iPads so far, is expected to continue to dominate the market in the near term. With the entry of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, we may be about to see a shift.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Looks A Winner

Technorati Tags: Android, Apple, ipad, patent, tablet

Related Posts

• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)
• November 29, 2011 -- Google’s Android May Pay Billions To Apple (3)
• November 10, 2011 -- Awesome Siri, Aweless Iris (3)
• November 8, 2011 -- Siri Is An Android Killer (8)

… But what do you think about the Android’s ” Iris ” . Do you think it can compete with Siri?

I had never heard about the Android Iris, so some immediate exploring was required.  Yes indeed, there is an Android app called Iris.  Apparently there had been a later version of the app that was issued and then withdrawn so the only one available at present is a prior version.

Some quick checks with Iris soon demonstrated that this was not at all comparable with the Apple Siri.  It appears to be something to provide voice input to searches, but even on that the performance was very variable.

Since Andy Rubin, the Senior Vice President responsible for Google Mobile including Android, had spoken out against Siri, it was somewhat surprising to see an app that apparently tried to give the same Siri functionality to an Android device.

After a little research, I was not convinced that Iris would ever become a mainstream Android application.  Here are the facts as I was able to put them together.

The Iris Chronology

Iris is produced by Dexetra Software Solutions  located in Cochin, India.  The dexetra tagline is delivering surprises

How they got involved with producing Iris is explained in their blog.

A day when Siri inspired us to create Iris for Android

It started out as a lazy Friday with half our team missing, the influx of tweets and posts on the “Awesome Siri” were flying everywhere. Suddenly, I got the urge to do something similar for Android.

After eight hours of frenzied teamwork the first version of Iris was produced.  The response from those they were in contact with was so positive that they decided to develop a version that could be put in the Android app market.

The blog then tells us: Iris (improved) goes live on Android market.

… and indeed it is and you can download it for free.  I found it less than satisfactory.  If you disagree, then by all means add your comments below.

My View On Iris

Iris may be improved but it is very much at the alpha state and in my opinion it is unlikely to get to a beta version that will excite any interest among potential users.  In addition since the official Google mobile strategy does not seem to envision a Siri-type functionality for Android devices, I do not think any significant resources will be invested in it.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Awesome Siri, Aweless Iris

Technorati Tags: Android, Andy Rubin, Apple, dexetra, iris, siri

Related Posts

• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)
• November 8, 2011 -- Siri Is An Android Killer (8)
• October 31, 2011 -- Should Smartphones Be Smart (0)
• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 3, 2011 -- Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Looks A Winner (1)

The Forbes Debate On Whether Siri Is A Google Killer

Whether provocatively or by happenstance, Forbes raised the hype by publishing two conflicting commentaries on this.  Eric Jackson wrote a piece on why Siri is a Google killer.  Ten days later David Coursey countered with a piece on why Siri is not a Google killer. Both contributors are knowledgeable in the field so clearly this question is not easily resolved.

Eric Jackson Sheds More Light on The Google Mobile Team

Eric Jackson has written a most interesting post on the history of voice technology and described how some of the key players have been involved. He was involved in the voice technology sector and knows the players and their motivations. You might well think from that review that the present Google mobile team was well placed and very experienced to take the right strategic decision.

One item in that post is a video produced by Apple in 1987 as their vision of where this technology might go.  This is produced below.

An Apple Future Vision Becomes Reality

The first video here is Apple’s visionary view in 1987 of the Knowledge Navigator:

The second video is a demo of the new Siri application on the Apple iPhone 4s.

As you may notice, most of the functionalities envisaged in 1987 are now available almost a quarter of a century later.  It may have taken a long time to come together, but clearly this is a practical approach at this time.

Google May  Continue Its Present Mobile Strategy

Although Siri has done much more in the artificial intelligence field than Android has (as far as is public), Google could certainly put the resources in place to do their Android version of Siri, if it wished.  It certainly has some of the brightest people in voice technology.  However I believe there are reasons why, as an organization, they will be reluctant to do this.  That is why I wrote in Technorati that Siri will be a Google Mobile killer. The reasons I set out in the article were the following:

1. Google Is A Product-Driven Company
2. Google Thinks Apple Is Wrong
3. Google Is Proud
4. Smart Phones Should Use Voice Input Not Finger Swipes

The first reason is why Google will not acknowledge the importance of the fourth reason.

Apple Will Have A 2 Year Lead In The Mobile Internet

I am not alone in this line of thinking.  Gary Morgenthaler, a partner at Morgenthaler Ventures, recognized expert in artificial intelligence, and a Siri board member and investor argues that Apple now has at least a two-year advantage over Google in the war for best smartphone platform.

Apple is now offering through semantic analysis and artificial intelligence the opportunity to interact with your mobile device to home in on the right answer or complete the right task.  This is quite counter to the typical Google approach where they hope by understanding enough about you and your preferences, they will deliver exactly the answer you want in one pass.  That may be an additional reason why Google will reluctantly followed the Siri lead when the marketplace shows that it is inevitable.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Siri Is An Android Killer

Technorati Tags: Android, Apple, artificial intelligence, siri, voice technology

Related Posts

• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)
• November 10, 2011 -- Awesome Siri, Aweless Iris (3)
• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 3, 2011 -- Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Looks A Winner (1)
• November 29, 2011 -- Google’s Android May Pay Billions To Apple (3)

He was speaking last week at the AsiaD Conference and expressed the somewhat surprising view that a phone should be merely a phone.  This is how he set out his views about Siri and the iPhone:.

I don’t believe that your phone should be an assistant. Your phone is a tool for communicating. You shouldn’t be communicating with the phone; you should be communicating with somebody on the other side of the phone. … To some degree it is natural for you to talk to your phone. We’ll see how pervasive it gets. … This isn’t a new notion. In projecting the future, I think Apple did a good job of figuring out when the technology was ready to be consumer-grade.

Here is how the Siri website describes what it does for you.

It helps you do the things you do every day.

Ask Siri to text your dad, remind you to call the dentist, or find directions, and it figures out which apps to use and who you’re talking about. It finds answers for you from the web through sources like Yelp and WolframAlpha. Using Location Services, it looks up where you live, where you work, and where you are. Then it gives you information and the best options based on your current location. From the details in your contacts, it knows your friends, family, boss, and coworkers. So you can tell Siri things like “Text Ryan I’m on my way” or “Remind me to make a dentist appointment when I get to work” or “Call a taxi” and it knows exactly what you mean and what to do.

Perhaps the following video will give you a better appreciation of what it does.

Siri involves many partners in its technology, but perhaps the most impressive is the contribution promoted by SRI International, the DARPA PAL program.

The DARPA PAL program (the Personalized Assistant that Learns) focused on improving the way that computers support humans through the use of cognitive systems—that is, systems that reason, learn from experience, and accept guidance in order to provide effective, personalized assistance.

SRI International has led the PAL Framework effort to make available many of the successful machine learning and reasoning technologies developed on the PAL program for use by the broader DARPA, research, and military communities.

Clearly the iPhone with Siri is one smart phone, whatever Mr. Rubin may opine.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Should Smartphones Be Smart

Technorati Tags: Android, Andy Rubin, iPhone, siri

Related Posts

• November 10, 2011 -- Awesome Siri, Aweless Iris (3)
• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)
• November 8, 2011 -- Siri Is An Android Killer (8)
• November 16, 2008 -- Botch Your Buzz (ByB) (2)

The One Web Principle

The W3C set out the following praise-worthy target as its One Web Principle:

One Web means making, as far as is reasonable, the same information and services available to users irrespective of the device they are using. However, it does not mean that exactly the same information is available in exactly the same representation across all devices. The context of mobile use, device capability variations, bandwidth issues and mobile network capabilities all affect the representation.

The StayGoLinks view was that the technical challenges were such that this One Web Principle could never be practical.  Just think of the ‘real-estate’ difference between a smartphone ( say 320 pixels by 480 pixels ) versus the most popular desktop screen at this time ( 1024 pixels by 768 pixels ).  The screen areas are in the ratio of 1 to 5, which reflects a major difference in information that can be displayed.  Bear in mind that the touch screen of the smartphone must be controlled by a possibly stubby finger, whereas the desktop device is controlled by the precision of a mouse or other pointing device.

The Multi-Web Practice

The Multi-Web Practice suggested that any online website should perhaps have several versions, each optimized for a particular device, whether it be a desktop or a mobile device.  The practice would have involved a multi-dimension coordinate or array of URIs, clearly indicating the association between the various versions.

As is clear and perhaps rightly, this multidimensional array of URIs did not attract any support.  However the notion of  a number of associated websites is very much the normal practice.  Many of the major news sources and blogs have separate mobile versions usually located on a subdomain of the main domain.  For example if a news site for desktop visitors was located at the main domain, www.news_site.com, then the version for mobile devices would be located at m.news_site.com.

These mobile versions are usually fairly ‘thin’ representations of the full website.  Google has suggested what needs to be done to produce these thinner versions, or mobile friendly websites as they are often dubbed.  It usually means reducing the size of images and cutting out anything which is too large for the small screen.

Interactive Websites Need Apps

If a website involves interactions where visitors must input data or select among options, then the smartphone screen is usually somewhat small to display the offers.  An App could be devised with the particular mobile device in mind.  This would allow the visitor to carry out the task in the most effective way considering whatever limitations that particular mobile device may have.

Despite the attraction of this argument, it appears that marketers are not yet convinced about Apps and will merely try to achieve the best mobile website they can.  Hopefully the marketers will keep good analytics on how well visitors do achieve what they hoped to do and so can adopt the App approach when they realize the improvements in performance that can be made.

Informational Websites Can Be Merely Mobile Friendly

Purely informational websites can be less demanding.  The only ‘task’ a visitor wishes to accomplish is to navigate to another web page.  Provided links are easily clicked on then the mobile website will function quite well with some careful work in design.  However as was noted in the first article mentioned,  even some of the most visited news websites have mobile versions that do not rate well using the MobileOK Validator from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

WordPress And The Twenty Eleven Theme

The approach that SMM has adopted is to use the latest default theme from WordPress.org, which is titled Twenty Eleven (twentyeleven).  A great deal of effort has gone into the preparation of this them to ensure that it will render well in mobile devices.  Here is how the theme web page describes the theme:

The 2011 theme for WordPress is sophisticated, lightweight, and adaptable. Make it yours with a custom menu, header image, and background — then go further with available theme options for light or dark color scheme, custom link colors, and three layout choices. Twenty Eleven comes equipped with a Showcase page template that transforms your front page into a showcase to show off your best content, widget support galore (sidebar, three footer areas, and a Showcase page widget area), and a custom “Ephemera” widget to display your Aside, Link, Quote, or Status posts. Included are styles for print and for the admin editor, support for featured images (as custom header images on posts and pages and as large images on featured “sticky” posts), and special styles for six different post formats.

All the main SMM blogs are now using child versions of this theme including this blog, which is the recommended way to use the theme.  WordPress is also being used as the Content Management System (CMS) for the SMM website.  The actual website is rendered using a child version of the twentyeleven theme and all web pages do display well in mobile devices.

Although the mobile device screen displays of the SMM online properties are now very acceptable, they still are not as usable as they would be if conceived specifically for a mobile device probably using an App.  However for a small or mid-sized business, using a mobile friendly website is probably a reasonable compromise, given the visitor traffic that is gained by these online properties.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Making Websites Mobile Friendly Is Better Than Nothing

Technorati Tags: Android, apps, mobile friendly, one web, Smartphone, W3C

Related Posts

• October 20, 2009 -- A Real Google Phone (1)
• January 29, 2012 -- The App Internet – Disruptive Technology For Google Search (1)
• January 2, 2012 -- NFC For Mobile Payments In 2012 (4)
• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)

How Samsung describes the Samsung Galaxy S

It’s not surprising that Samsung should describe it in glowing terms but their enthusiasm is well justified.

Galaxy S Fascinate is your entertainment and gaming dream phone with an incredible 1 GHz processor, HD video and 3D sound. Videos, movies and games come to life, literally jumping off the 4″ Super AMOLED touchscreen that’s bright in any light. Enjoy full integration with Google and access Gmail, Google Search, YouTube™ – plus download thousands of Android™ apps on Android Market. And with full HTML web browsing, 5 MP camera, Social Hub™ with preloaded social network sites, integrated calendar and email, the Galaxy S Fascinate puts the whole bright, beautiful world in your hand.

Galaxy S named European Smartphone of the Year at the EISA Awards 2010–2011

The Galaxy S was very well received and as of January 2011, Samsung had sold 10 million Galaxy S phones globally.  It was named the European Smartphone of the Year at the European Imaging and Sound Association Awards 2010–2011.

Here is what appealed to the judges:

The Samsung GALAXY S II should attract huge interest due to its stunning Super AMOLED Plus 4.3-inch (10.9 cm) display as well as the speed of operation offered by a 1.2 G?z dual core processor. With this device in your hands you feel like you can do whatever you want whether this is browsing the Internet, shooting Full HD video, playing back all kinds of media (most codec’s are included), gaming or taking pictures even in subdued light thanks to the integrated LED flash and 8 megapixel sensor. The super slim 8.49mm body, Android v2.3 operating system and the delightfully user-friendly Touch Wiz UX interface all combine to offer users an exciting and highly competent product.

How the Galaxy S Fascinate is working out for me

I can certainly concur with the descriptions given above. The Galaxy S Fascinate has many virtues and few if any vices that I have run into.  My biggest motivation in buying this smartphone was that it was an Android phone.  This is a priority area for Google and I’m sure the integration with other Google Account systems will increase by leaps and bounds. I’m a heavy user of Gmail and Google Docs and both are extremely user-friendly in the Galaxy S Fascinate.

Like any smartphone, heavy use of the apps and games can quickly deplete the battery.  However with it plugged in and using my local Wifi network, it’s essentially my mobile device on the Internet.  Comparing a website on the Galaxy S Fascinate with what appears on my desktop is often a revelation.

This whole website was set up to view the mobile world from a desktop perspective and this smartphone is an essential tool in that.  The biggest insight to develop from all this is just how slow most companies are to have an effective mobile web presence.  The best advice to a website developer who is locked in to the desktop perspective is probably to say “You can’t start from here.”  As smartphones become ever more popular, the importance of starting with that mobile perspective will be self-evident.

Post from: StayGoLinks

Samsung Galaxy S Fascinate 3G Smartphone

Technorati Tags: Android, Google, samsung galaxy, Super AMOLED

Related Posts

• October 20, 2009 -- A Real Google Phone (1)
• January 29, 2012 -- The App Internet – Disruptive Technology For Google Search (1)
• December 30, 2011 -- iPhone vs Android: Which Won In 2011? (9)
• December 15, 2011 -- Android’s Majel Is Not An Apple Siri Rival (4)
• December 3, 2011 -- Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Looks A Winner (1)