Comments on: A Turbulent River – the Mobile Web http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm The Mobile Web From A Desktop Perspective Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:54:21 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Paulina Ayala http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm/comment-page-1#comment-85471 Paulina Ayala Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:52:21 +0000 http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm#comment-85471 is it still relevant, investing in mobi domains or all the good stuff is already taken? is it still relevant, investing in mobi domains or all the good stuff is already taken?

]]> By: admin http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10218 admin Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:47:56 +0000 http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm#comment-10218 Oops in my previous post, I omitted to mention the W3C Mobile Web Best Practices checker (Beta) http://validator.w3.org/mobile/ Staygolinks is equally poor using this validator but it does give much more detail automatically on the errors. Oops in my previous post, I omitted to mention the W3C Mobile Web Best Practices checker (Beta)
http://validator.w3.org/mobile/
Staygolinks is equally poor using this validator but it does give much more detail automatically on the errors.

]]> By: admin http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10179 admin Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:12:51 +0000 http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm#comment-10179 Hi Christina. You possibly saw these other related links but for completeness I'll add them here. The World Wide Web Consortium describes what is required in mobile websites in this document: W3C mobileOK Scheme 1.0 W3C Working Draft 12 July 2006 http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK/ From that you can find what they define as Basic Tests: 3C mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 W3C Working Draft 30 January 2007 http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/ On the website you identified, I found the following page particularly good: Tools & Resources http://pc.dev.mobi/?q=node/71 To test a website for mobi readiness, I used the following: Are You Mobi Ready? http://ready.mobi/index.html Needless to say, this website that was designed for Desktop PCs did very poorly. Hi Christina. You possibly saw these other related links but for completeness I’ll add them here.

The World Wide Web Consortium describes what is required in mobile websites in this document:
W3C mobileOK Scheme 1.0
W3C Working Draft 12 July 2006
http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK/

From that you can find what they define as Basic Tests:
3C mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0
W3C Working Draft 30 January 2007
http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/

On the website you identified, I found the following page particularly good:
Tools & Resources
http://pc.dev.mobi/?q=node/71

To test a website for mobi readiness, I used the following:
Are You Mobi Ready?
http://ready.mobi/index.html
Needless to say, this website that was designed for Desktop PCs did very poorly.

]]> By: Christina Niven http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm/comment-page-1#comment-10173 Christina Niven Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:02:23 +0000 http://www.staygolinks.com/a-turbulent-river-the-mobile-web.htm#comment-10173 Hi Barry. I just started looking around to find info on how to design for the mobi domain. Here is a site I came across. Looks like a good place to start. Let me know of others if you can. They have a program that will test your site to see how it scores for mobile use. My regular sites didn't pass. http://pc.dev.mobi/?q=node/201 Hi Barry. I just started looking around to find info on how to design for the mobi domain. Here is a site I came across. Looks like a good place to start. Let me know of others if you can. They have a program that will test your site to see how it scores for mobile use. My regular sites didn’t pass.

http://pc.dev.mobi/?q=node/201

]]>