A Turbulent River - the Mobile Web

Andy Capp

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog. Or you can subscribe to a combined news feed for all SMM publications. Thanks for visiting!

Both Vint Cerf and Bill Gates have described the Internet as a tidal wave, however as mentioned in a previous post it may give a clearer picture if we think of the Internet or the World Wide Web as a river. In this picture, we are not just thinking of the electronic infrastructure that connects all Internet participants, but rather the totality of what can be found in cyberspace including all those websites and the software and the devices that are used to participate. That indeed is a very turbulent river.

Turbulent River

This picture came to mind in thinking about a post by Ross Dunn on the Mobile Search Site Creation and Optimization session at the Search Engine Strategies (SES) Conference in New York. He describes sessions by Cindy Krum of Blue Moon Works and Rachel Pasqua, Director of Mobile Marketing at iCrossing. The two took diametrically different approaches to designing mobile websites.

Cindy Krum felt strongly that an existing website should pull double-duty as both the wired and the mobile version by using CSS to provide an alternative, mobile friendly version shown only to mobile users. On the other hand, Rachel Pasqua stated firmly that offering your current website to users, reformatted or not, would likely provide a less than desirable user experience. She went on to explain that mobile users should see an entirely different, more time efficient version of your website because such users are task oriented. In other words, Cindy was following the One Web principle while Rachel was using the Multi-Web practice.

That’s where old Heraclitus suggesting you cannot jump into the same river twice came to mind. Thinking back to a simpler world, the main problem was which browser you should design for. One history of browsers by Peter-Paul Koch suggests that following the browser wars from 1997-1999, you had a period of Explorer dominance from 1999 to 2003. Cindy Krum could have been giving her presentation in 2003 to help push the One Web message that web pages should use CSS style sheets and be satisfactory whatever the browser used. Even then the Internet river was somewhat turbulent and the One Web canoe had a bumpy ride. Some websites even now do not always display well in all the major browsers.

In 2004, the river was looking to become much more turbulent. The browser confusion continued but in addition a massively diverse set of devices was available. There was also the possibility of .mobi domains specifically for mobile devices. Well we now have dotmobi domains and websites. In addition there are many other players doing what they believe to be right and in their own interests on this Mobile web. The One Web canoe that might almost have worked in 2003 does not stand a chance in the extreme white-water rapids of the Internet river of 2007. So all strength to people like Rachel Pasqua, who are taking a practical approach to having websites that work.

Related: The Internet Tidal Wave

Posts You May Like From The Archives

If you liked this and/or found it useful, why not vote for it in your favourite social media, using the eKstreme.com Socializer.

 

4 Responses to “A Turbulent River - the Mobile Web”

  1. Christina Niven Says:

    Hi Barry. I just started looking around to find info on how to design for the mobi domain. Here is a site I came across. Looks like a good place to start. Let me know of others if you can. They have a program that will test your site to see how it scores for mobile use. My regular sites didn’t pass.

    http://pc.dev.mobi/?q=node/201

  2. admin Says:

    Hi Christina. You possibly saw these other related links but for completeness I’ll add them here.

    The World Wide Web Consortium describes what is required in mobile websites in this document:
    W3C mobileOK Scheme 1.0
    W3C Working Draft 12 July 2006
    http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK/

    From that you can find what they define as Basic Tests:
    3C mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0
    W3C Working Draft 30 January 2007
    http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/

    On the website you identified, I found the following page particularly good:
    Tools & Resources
    http://pc.dev.mobi/?q=node/71

    To test a website for mobi readiness, I used the following:
    Are You Mobi Ready?
    http://ready.mobi/index.html
    Needless to say, this website that was designed for Desktop PCs did very poorly.

  3. admin Says:

    Oops in my previous post, I omitted to mention the W3C Mobile Web Best Practices checker (Beta)
    http://validator.w3.org/mobile/
    Staygolinks is equally poor using this validator but it does give much more detail automatically on the errors.

  4. Paulina Ayala Says:

    is it still relevant, investing in mobi domains or all the good stuff is already taken?

Leave a Reply